Memorandum Afghanistan
TO: President
Donald Trump
FROM: Nate
Pappas
Date: 15 August
2017
RE: Troop
Increases in Afghanistan
Memorandum Troop Influx
Introduction
The United
States has been at “war” with terrorism and radical Islam for the past 17
years. We could not sit back and watch as entire nations succumbed to terrible
acts, and watched as thousands of innocent people, at home, and abroad die
because of those factors. President George W. Bush launched an invasion into
Afghanistan with the aim to stop the breeding of terrorism and radical Islam,
to stop the senseless killing, However, what has changed since then?
Current Situation in Afghanistan
After the terror
attacks on Septemeber 11th, 2001; the US needed to respond somehow.
That response was a full-fledged invasion into Afghanistan to take out the
terror forces of Al-Queada and the Taliban. Since the invasion in 2002, over 2,000
American soldiers have been killed in the warring state. As it seems, little
has been accomplished, although troop deaths have been on the decrease in the
last few years. Despite this, and the withdrawal of troops in the country, the
Taliban and ISIS have been coming back and taking control of significant
territory. With this has come more civilian attacks and the killings of other
Afghans. The country is in no better state now than it was during the invasion,
hundreds are killed each month by terror attacks even in Kabul. The real
question is what should be done about this ongoing issue, and current hints
from the administration point to a new course of action.
Implementation
President Donald
Trump, with the guidance of Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, has begun the
preparations to send more troops into Afghanistan. This move is similar to
President Obama's troop surge in 2009. Up to a couple years ago it finally
seemed that we had begun to "win" in Afghanistan, but in the last two
to three years, it has become apparent that we, in fact, are not close to
winning. This has to do with aimless strategy going back to the Bush years and
the Obama years. The US had been slowly whittling out soldiers from the country
despite ongoing violence.
Up until a few
days ago, it seemed like the President’s policy was a continuation of older
ones, like the continued removal of troops in the country. But, that changed
all of a sudden when it was announced rather shockingly that up to 4,000 more
troops would be sent over in the next couple of months with the aim to quell
the recent unrest and violence. The aim of this move is to essentially show the
Taliban and ISIS, who have taken significant land, that the US was not going to
mess around in the region anymore. However, I believe that this is the wrong
way to go about things. Enough is enough, we cannot continue to say we are
pulling the troops out, then having to send them back in. If we must nation
build, then that is all we should do. What should happen in the area is first
to have a peacekeeping corps come in, whether from NATO or the UN. While this
is happening, begin the process of finding the right fit of government for the
area. We have seen too often that not every type of government fits each
nation. Look at what has worked in the country in the past, then try to start
the implementation process. Next, hold elections and referendums, while the
peacekeepers are keeping the peace. Have them stay in the country for a year or
two, just to ensure it is stable enough to leave.
Sending more
troops might be an option, but it does not solve the problem. The
implementation of successful governmental authority and system will drastically
help in decreasing the unstable nature of Afghanistan. Having a clear-cut
strategy and not one of crushing everything, might go a long way in achieving
victory.
Closing Remarks
Afghnatisna
along with Iraq has long been a thorn in the last few president's sides.
Clearly, the strategy that has been implemented is flawed if no significant
changes have been made. Sending in more troops and taking them out has become a
revolving door with no continuity whatsoever.It is time to rethink our strategy
and to prevent the needless loss of American soldiers lives. After all, we must
do best for our country, and establish a stable government might go a long way
in ending this situation.
Nate, I really liked your paragraph about the implementation of the situation in Afghanistan. I agree with you about the troops. We cannot keep pulling troops out then sending them back in because it does not produce lasting stability in the country. I also like your idea about including NATO and UN peacekeepers into the operation because for the most part, the United States has been fighting alone. I was a little confused about your introduction paragraph because you don't really have a call to action. Stating that we need a better plan for the troops in the introduction would make the implementation paragraph even stronger.
ReplyDeleteNate, I found your tactic to properly dispurse the tensions of the area intriguing. I think the use of NATO and UN peacekeepers is the best tactic as it should be known that the United States is not the world police and there are systems in place for dealing with these problems. Also, when you talk about our constant removal and then increase of troops in the area by the US is a matter that I would believe most Americans agree on. The call for removal is almost always negated by the new threats that arise and take away what has been gained.
ReplyDelete